The Langley Corruptionator

More Terrorism.

2009-02-17T21:21:00.000-08:00

The corruptionator had been planning to describe tonight the latest terrorism incident perpertrated on two long term decent law abiding Township residents thanks to the six stinking sack of pigshit crooked puppet councilors and Bob Long's sack of pigshit criminal thug buddy but that will have to be a story for another day, as the Corruptionator is somewhat reflective tonight and doesn't feel like writing about the six stinking sack of pigshit crooked puppet councilors.

The following story has absolutely nothing whatever to do with the Township of Langley or its six crooked puppet councilors, and probably doesn't even really belong in The Langley Corruptionator but, completely unexpectedly, it was part of what I experienced today, and I just happen to feel like writing it down here.

The mother of a friend called this afternoon. Her brother had passed away, somewhat suddenly, a few weeks short of his 87nd birthday, and a prayer service was being held. I went to mass then the prayer service afterward. He hadn't been a rich man so the crowd wasn't large, maybe forty people or so, a handful of devout Catholics from Holy Rosary Cathedral and relatives of the deceased. After the priest had finished the prayers my friend's mother took over conducting the service. She is a fairly competent public speaker.She first told us about her brother's life. She then called about 15 of us up one by one to stand in front of the casket and pay our last respects to the deceased as she gave a short introduction and talk about each of us. Most of the relatives of the deceased placed their hands on him or on his folded hands as she spoke. One even leaned over and kissed his forehead as well. As the service ended a priest who had been seated with us on the pews during the service suggested to my friend she get a sister of hers to sing a song in their language, Carrier. It turned out the sister who was the good singer had already left for the reception so one of her other sisters sang instead. No music, just one single voice in the cavernous cathedral. The song was unlike any other native Indian song I'd ever heard. All I'd ever heard before were chanting type songs accompanied by a tom tom sort of drum. This song was entirely different. Just a lone voice softly singing. I doubt if anyone who didn't know otherwise and could only listen and not look could even guess it was a B.C. Indian singing in a B.C. Indian language. If asked to guess a person who could only hear the song could reasonably have given as an answer that the song was being sung by anyone in the world, and that they were singing it anywhere in the world. The song was soft and melodic, and, as I said before, completely unlike any native song I'd ever heard. I couldn't understand a single word but somehow that soft song was surprisingly moving. When she finished singing she explained to us in English that her mother had taught her the song. Her mother told her that years ago many of their people were dying and they had gone to the Oblate priests to ask them what to do. That is when the priests had taught them the song. She told us the song is only sung at funerals. She told us its about little hands and little feet, the little hands and little feet of baby Jesus.

Thanks for the info. John.

2009-02-16T13:21:00.000-08:00

Regarding:

"John P. said...

I do hear and see that the "out there" blog has removed references to a certain party and that a police complaint was definitely going to happen. Perhaps the author will now see the RCMP in action, and the Criminal Code that he loves to quote being fully enforced upon him? There has been no absence of hate remarks and libel against a large group and I do hear that that group has not had to report anything as some monitoring "

Thanks for the timely info John, I was just now wondering whether that complaint was going anywhere. If I don't hear otherwise in the next few days I'll assume it is and I'll be filing my own complaint with regard to that specific matter involving "Rocky" and the crooked councilors blog of lies and I will start deciding exactly which witnesses and documentation and records I will subpoena and start preparing my list of questions. And don't forget, if by some bizarre set of freak circumstances, you do manage to get me charged with something, I can ask you questions, but if I don't choose to testify, you won't be asking me any.( Although I suppose I would be testifying in the related threatening trial, should it be necessary for me to file that complaint, which I have no interest in doing unless its necessary, because "Rocky" and the "Rocky" matter are entirely peripheral to my primary concern) ( And if The " Rocky" complaint is pursued, making it necessary for me to file a complaint related to it, and if the RCMP don't act on my complaint, then I'm off to motions court to file a private information.)

If "Rocky" hadn't lent his name to that crooked councilor's blog of lies which contains absolutely nothing but complete outright lies about criminal matters involving Bob Long's criminal buddy, theft and fraud, and the Langley RCMP, and myself, then this current matter involving "Rocky" would never have arisen. As I have stated previously, if the crooked councilors wish to spend the next two years attending court, I've already started my preparations. I'm certain every voter in Langley is going to be very appreciative of having complete transcripts of the trial delivered on their doorstep prior to the next municipal elections. If you're that desperate to make the National News, you're on.

Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we seek to deceive, eh Bob?

It's high time the lot of you stopped inhaling, screwed the tops back on the cans of laquer thinner, went outside and breathed deeply for a while, and asked yourselves, " Is it really worth my political career to continue assisting Bob Long's psychopathic criminal buddy in breaking every law he wants to break so he can terrorize two decent, law abiding, very long term resident Township ratepaying citizens out of the home they've owned and lived in for the past three decades?"

My New Hobby

2009-02-16T08:45:00.001-08:00

My new hobby is reading the criminal code and related judgements. Some people drink beer and watch football games on TV, some people go to hockey games, some people ride Harleys, but me, I read the criminal code and judgements. It relaxes me, I enjoy it, Its fascinating. So, just for amusement's sake, and for no other reason, I thought I might share a little of my hobby with readers of The Langley Corruptionator. Any reader is more than welcome to submit their thoughts or comments, or some may even know answers to questions I am pondering. I will eventually find the answers to these questions by web surfing enough case law, but in the meantime readers should feel free to submit their own ideas.

Purely as an intellectual excercise, and for no other, reason I thought I might share with readers one of the questions I am currently pondering. For example, in this particular law;

"Breach of trust by public officer

122. Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person. "

Someone has told me the " trust" in the phrase " breach of trust" in this law must be the same as the " trust" in something like the trust agreement between a lawyer and client, or between say a house owner and the bank holding his mortgage. But I am wondering if this is always the case? Might that essentail element of the offense be fulfilled because their exists an implied trust agreement between a citizen and a public officer? That implied trust agreement being that a public officer must act in the interest of the public he serves. I don't know. I'll eventually find the answer by surfing enough case law, but any reader out there should feel free to submit any thoughts and ideas they might have.And I reiterate, this is merely a hobby, a mental excercise like crosswords or sudoku,and no one should construe this post to mean anything other than that.

Mr. Apprentice Prime Minister Jordan Bateman

2009-02-15T09:43:00.000-08:00

So where's the tapes Mr. Apprentice Prime Minister?

You know, the tapes of a delegate's appearance where he said he'd spoken to the RCMP and the RCMP said they would investigate the theft of township property if council referred the matter to them for investigation? The tapes will also include the second matter the delegate mentioned at the same time, a matter of defrauding the Township of which he was 99.99% certain had occurred,which he asked be referred to the RCMP along with the theft. The tapes of you, Mr. Apprentice Prime Minister, and the five other puppets sitting on their hands and saying nothing after the only council member with integrity made a motion to refer the both of these matters to the RCMP, as the RCMP had requested? ( Strictly speaking the RCMP at that point had said nothing about the matter of the Criminal Code of Canada fraud, they were then only aware of the theft) The tapes which will show as well that after discussing the matter in the 7 o'clock meeting that day, you and the puppets did nothing.

These tapes are the tapes someone on the crooked councilors blog of lies wrote a complete pack of lies about.

You aren't trying to pull a Nixon tapes manoeuver are you?

( They might actually be audio CDs or DVDs rather than tapes, I don't know yet; But I do know that Richard M.Nixon's missing 17 minutes were once upon a time on tape.) ( I like Nixon by the way, he believed he had to do what he did for the good of his country, unlike, for example,Spiro Agnew or the Langley Good Ole Boys friends and insiders, who are just trying to stuff more cash in their pockets any way they can.)

............................................................................................................................................................................

A Sample Oath of Office for those who may be interested:

Oath of Office.

I, Bob Long, do swear that I’m qualified to hold the office of councillor for the Township of Langley to which I have been elected. I have not by myself or any other person knowingly contravened the Local Government Act respecting vote buying or intimidation in relation to my election to the office. I will faithfully perform the duties of my office and I will not allow any private interests to influence my conduct in public matters and as required by the local Government Act I will disclose any direct or indirect pecuniary interest I have in a matter and will not participate in a discussion of the matter and will not vote in respect of the matter.

P.S. to the legislative assistant who I asked three months ago for a copy of the oath of office, and who I left follow up telephone messages with asking where it was,and who I never heard from again: it's O.K., don't worry about it.

A warm welcome to our new readers.

2009-02-14T16:00:00.000-08:00

The Langley Corruptionator has just learned we have a new regular reader( or readers) on board. Welcome, the more Township people made aware of Township corruption the better.

We'd suggest our new regular readers may find the earlier articles in The Langley Corruptionator regarding Township criminal activity to be especially interesting, something to look into on those occasional long boring days when there's not much else going on.

I'll tell our new readers one thing, I sure am pissed at our crooked councilors for having blown the Township budgets on a restaurant, a golf course, lied to us about the P3 that wasn't so they could cut a one sided deal with the taxpayers holding the short end of the stick, squanderd $50 million on an overpass in the wrong place to scam 250 acres out of the ALR, signed no questions asked fat contracts with public sector unions, etc. etc. etc.

If we had any reporters in the Township, instead of human tape recorders regurgitating the party line, these crooks never would never have gotten away with their scams.

The reason I'm so pissed is because if our crooked councilors hadn't blown the budgets on these special interest groups who guarantee their re-election, then Langley Township would have hired enough cops that gangsters don't make Langley the favored underpoliced locale for shootout of the week down at your local neighbourhood shopping center, and I wouldn't have had to spend a few weeks patiently trailing the bicycle riding crackheads by 50 yards in my vehicle for an hour or so at 3AM each night 'til they learned to go steal stuff in somebody else's neighborhood.

But you guy's already knew that, 'cause you've read it here, right?

ttys,

The Langley Corruptionator.

( And remember, its only defamatory libel if you know it to be untrue, if you can prove it's true in a court of law, then that's an entirely different kettle of fish, isn't it?)
( And we welcome the additional attention, none of these criminal stinking sacks of pigshit are morally fit to hold public office, and the more people who discover that, the better.)
( And what's the holdup with the Coleman/Polak investigation? Unlike any of the so called " newspapers" in this Township, I carefully read the legislation at the time, and it seemed to me they were both as guilty as sin. A slam dunk which shouldn't have taken more than a week to investigate. I actually liked Coleman, up until I discovered he was associated with the crooks occupying space in Township hall).

Townhall meetings and Adolf Hitler.

2009-02-13T09:02:00.000-08:00

Adolf Hitler banned independent videocameras from his early Town Hall meetings.

Apparently some Township residents support Adolf Hitler's policy and support its enforcement at our local politician's Town Hall meetings here in Aldergrove. No videocameras , for the Greater Good of The Reich!Only National Socialist Party Approved Propaganda! Heil Hitler!

Adolf Hitler had no need to ban independent videographers by the time his Olympics rolled around because by then he'd sent all the Fatherland's independent videographers to camp.

How does the Langley Corruptionator know this?

Because someone has posted a comment on the crooked councillor's blog of lies run by pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members and consumers of fag prostitute's services.

Shame on you! How many pieces of silver did you sell out for?

And people wonder how the crooked councillors got away with lieing to us for two years saying the Langley Events Center was a P3 when in reality it wasn't, it was a crooked deal where taxpayers are on the hook for costs and expenses while the crooked councillors insider friends walk away with signed contracts to collect the revenue.

And people wonder how the crooked councillors Jordan Bateman, Charlie Fox, Bob Long, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky and Grant Ward could get away with sinking all the Township's tax money into secret deals approved behind closed doors at improperly closed secret meetings designed to benefit the few at the expense of all the Township's taxpayers.
No wonder Langley is a gangster magnet, there are way too few cops in Langley because all the Township's tax monies and assets, which could have been used hiring cops, were squandered enriching the crooked councilors friends and insiders while the local so called "newspapers" distracted us with puffball stories about Township Hall Dog and Pony shows.

Thanks,

Adolf would be proud of you.

Addendum Feb. 14:

The Langley corruptionator would also like to take this opportunity to remind people of a fact no citizen of a democracy must ever forget, that Adolf Hitler was first elected to power in free and fair elections in what was at the time a free and democratic country. The Langley Corruptionator does not support North Korean style secrecy in the Township of Langley. The Langley Corruptionator does not support the rampant secrecy practised by the Township of Langley's six puppet politicians. This secrecy is entirely directed at concealing from the Township's citizens the fact that the Township's six crooked councilors serve a select few insiders and friends at the expense of the other 100,000 residents of the Township. And the six crooked councilors don't give a tinker's damn what the law says, or what the facts are, they are only interested in lining their buddy's pockets at every other citizens' expense.

And re: the pugilism, you're on Rocky. As its been a while since the Corruptionator has duked it out with a professionally trained boxer the Corruptionator will need a small number of warm up bouts. If Rocky wishes to arrange the small number of warmup bouts with the characters who's names the corruptionator will supply him, the Corruptionator will be more than happy to meet Rocky in the final bout.

And,pal, your 7:31pm comment had to go. the text was fine but I didn't click the video until after I'd posted it, and it was unacceptable. The Langley Corruptionator is a respectable source of Township news and commentary. That video did not meet our standards. Try the crooked councilors blog of lies run by pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members and consumers of fag prostitute's services. I'm sure they'd be happy to run it. Or at least they'd probably watch it themselves, over and over and over again, all day long, for weeks on end.

( And thanks for the humorous comment crooked councilors, BTW, any of you ever been to jail before? Think you're gonna like it?)

( And I am not withdrawing the the Third Reich analogy. The Township of Langley is a corrupt dictatorship presided over by the six aforementioned puppet councilors and the Township of Langley, like all dictatorships, has no respect for the rule of law.)

And pal, I have a big problem with that crooked puppet councilors blog of lies run by pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members and consumers of fag prostitute's services.

And you are obviously on glue if you think I altered any of your comments. I didn't touch them. I only deleted two of them, after I posted them , because I couldn't connect to the videos prior to that, and once I did I saw one was violent and the other the sickest most tragic and disturbing shit I'd seen in my life, both of them completely unsuitable for Langley Township's most honest and unbiased source of occasional news and commentary, The Langley Corruptionator.
We both know why you are trying to suggest I altered your comments. You've created some legal issues for yourself by sending them. Unfortunately for your entirely false suggestion that I altered anything in them, all the original e-mails are sitting unopened in my inbox since I posted them off the blog, not my email. I will be saving these e-mails should any need arise to further deal with the matter of the Adolf Hitler's Town Hall Meetings blog. I don't expect any need to arise to further deal with this matter as I have better things to do with my time.

pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members and fag prostitutes.

2009-02-12T07:50:00.000-08:00

If Lynn Whitehouse is such a fine and upstanding township citizen then why is she allowing her name to be used by the pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members and consumers of fag prostitute's services who run the crooked councilors B.S. spewing blog?

Is Lynn Whitehouse even aware that her name is being used by the pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members, and consumers of fag prostitute's services who run the crooked councilors B.S. spewing blog?

Even one so entirely devoid of integrity as Councilor Jordan Bateman is no longer plugging for this crooked councilors B.S. spewing blog so I just can't believe that Lynn Whitehouse would voluntarily choose to be associated with these pedophiles, child sex tourists, NAMBLA members, and consumers of fag prostitute's services.

Very Interesting.

2009-02-12T01:28:00.000-08:00

It is not necessary for there to be an offence under s. 111 of the Criminal Code that the accused acted dishonestly, corruptly, or even that he did some unlawful act. Those are all the substantive requirements of offences found elsewhere in the Code, including, for example, sections 108 [now 119] and 109 [now 120] of the Criminal Code where it is provided that the accused must have acted “corruptly”. These crimes are punished moreover much more severely.

The offence under s. 111 of the Criminal Code is, apart from several nuances, the codification of the Common Law crimes known under the name of “misbehaviour” and “misfeasance in office”.

Russell wrote:

“Misbehaviour in office is an indictable offence at common law and it is not essential that pecuniary damage should have resulted to the public by reason of such irregular conduct, nor that the defendant should have acted from corrupt motives.

NOTE TO SELF: Don't forget s.111 isn't called s.111 anymore. It has a new number now.

***************************************************************************************************************

Criminal Code of Canada.

2009-02-09T23:51:00.000-08:00

Parties to Offences

Parties to offence

21. (1) Every one is a party to an offence who

(a) actually commits it;

(b) does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or

Common intention

(2) Where two or more persons form an intention in common to carry out an unlawful purpose and to assist each other therein and any one of them, in carrying out the common purpose, commits an offence, each of them who knew or ought to have known that the commission of the offence would be a probable consequence of carrying out the common purpose is a party to that offence.

R.S., c. C-34, s. 21.

Offences of negligence — organizations

22.1 In respect of an offence that requires the prosecution to prove negligence, an organization is a party to the offence if

(a) acting within the scope of their authority

(i) one of its representatives is a party to the offence, or

(ii) two or more of its representatives engage in conduct, whether by act or omission, such that, if it had been the conduct of only one representative, that representative would have been a party to the offence; and

(b) the senior officer who is responsible for the aspect of the organization’s activities that is relevant to the offence departs — or the senior officers, collectively, depart — markedly from the standard of care that, in the circumstances, could reasonably be expected to prevent a representative of the organization from being a party to the offence.

2003, c. 21, s. 2.

Other offences — organizations

22.2 In respect of an offence that requires the prosecution to prove fault — other than negligence — an organization is a party to the offence if, with the intent at least in part to benefit the organization, one of its senior officers

(a) acting within the scope of their authority, is a party to the offence;

(b) having the mental state required to be a party to the offence and acting within the scope of their authority, directs the work of other representatives of the organization so that they do the act or make the omission specified in the offence; or

(c) knowing that a representative of the organization is or is about to be a party to the offence, does not take all reasonable measures to stop them from being a party to the offence.

2003, c. 21, s. 2.

Accessory after the fact

23. (1) An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing that a person has been a party to the offence, receives, comforts or assists that person for the purpose of enabling that person to escape.

(2) [Repealed, 2000, c. 12, s. 92]

Squish!

2009-02-09T08:23:00.000-08:00

So is anybody throwing anybody under the bus down there yet?

To the sack of feces crooked councillor who sent the anonymous message:

2009-02-08T18:06:00.000-08:00

To the sack of poop crooked councillor who sent me the anonymous message, ha ha ha, thanks for the motivation loser. In case you pathetic pieces of human fxxxxxg garbage haven't figured it out yet, your political careers are over, done, toast, finished,that's all she wrote. Every single one of you is going to be spending so much time in court over the next 2 or 3 years you might as well start holding Langley Township Council meetings in the lobbies of the Surrey Provincial Courthouse and New Westminster Supreme Courthouse.
When the voters find out how Bob Long has been helping his psychopathic sack of shit buddy break every single law that psychopathic sack of shit wants to break, and every one of you crooked sacks of poo went along with it,then every single one of you crooked sacks of feces can kiss your political careers goodbye. ( And the taxpayers are going to love finding out you six crooked councilors flushed $80,000 dollars of their hard earned tax dollars down the toilet helping Bob's psychopathic sack of shit criminal buddy break every law he wants to break).
The RCMP has been around probably 14 times thanks to the problems instigated by Bob Long's psychopathic sack of shit buddy and the gang of thugs he has living in his illegal suite village. If I had been doing anything at all wrong the RCMP would have discovered it. But you sacks of poo are going to learn all about it in court. Be sure to bring a paperback to read and a troothbrush.(<-- that "toothbrush" typo was obviously divinely inspired, I'm not going to edit it). When Bob Long brought his sack of shit thug buddy in to tell you a pack of completely irrelevant lies about someone who is completely irrelevant anyway as an excuse for letting him break any and every law he wants to break maybe you incompetent brain dead morons should have checked with the person he was telling the lies about.
Then you would have found out Bob's buddy is a psychopath. Too late now though. Crooked incompetent brain dead sacks of poo like you have no business holding public office and after all this is said and done none of you will ever hold public office ever again. Maybe you should have asked some questions when you had the opportunity to, you sacks of feces.
All you crooked pieces of filth had to do was respect and honour your commitment to the citizens of Langley Township to enforce the bylaws of Langley Township. Instead you have facilitated the terrorism of, and attempted murder of, and endangered the lives of, and invaded the privacy of,and destroyed the home of some very long term decent law abiding Township taxpaying citizens who have never broken a single law their entire lives and have never put even one foot wrong their entire lives. Not a single one of you six criminals is fit to hold public office and not a single one of you six criminals will hold public office ever again.

And the person you so disrespectfully refer to in your incredibly stupid note qualified in a profession and built his own practise and made more honest dollars through his own blood, sweat and initiative every single day than any one of you pathetic crooked leeches sucking off the public's tit will make in your entire lives.

crooked councillor puppy torturers.

2009-02-08T08:37:00.000-08:00

From the crooked councillors B.S. spewing blog of lies:

Anonymous said...

She has already flip flopped on fire fighters and lashed out at sports parents. I guess this volunteer group was next on her hit list. She is really self destructing.

Maybe she will kick a puppy next.

February 8, 2009 7:38 AM

You crooked councillor supporters are the ones to be telling lies and calling other people names aren't you? I've heard those puppies you guys torture by sodomizing at your glue sniffing out in the woods at midnight Bob Long and Jordan Bateman crooked councilor support rituals are already dead by the time you've finished with them anyway.

You criminal shitbags are getting really desperate about anyone being there to expose your secret deals to ripoff taxpayers aren't you? If it weren't for her none of the 100,000 township citizens being robbed for $50 million dollars in the mufford scam by you sacks of feces ever would have seen that piece of garbage Falcon's robbery ultimatum letter. You are the crooked shitbags who've kept this whole mufford overpass scam secret from its victims, the 100,000 residents of Langley township, ever since you first concocted the ripoff four years ago.

From the Crooked Councilors Anonymous Blog:

2009-02-08T05:34:00.000-08:00

The following Horseshit was published in the crooked councilors anonymous shit spewing blog:

Reliable Rumour has it that several volunteers and ToL taxpayers are furious at Councillor Kim Richter for smearing their organization on the other blog. Stay tuned as I hear they may confront her in council during the public meeting and take her to task!

dollars of their own tax money to build a useless overpass in the wrong place for no other reason than to connect a whole pile of roads and bridges to nowhere to it to scam 250 acres out of the ALR to enrich your friends. They are also especially irate that the ignorant snot Falcon is telling every one of Langley's 100, 000 citizens , " If you meaningless 100,000 serfs don't let us rip you off to enrich our friends with your own tax dollars we are going to take your tax dollars away from you and give them to somebody else." What's next you stinking puddle of pigshit Falcon, are you going to tell us to eat cake? (By the way I've voted SoCred and provincial liberal my entire life. I am never voting liberal ever again.)

If any of Langley's 200 respectable citizens who will be protesting these crooked politicians Monday Night are offended by the filthy languge I am using to describe these filthy politicians, my apologies to you 200 and only to you 200. I am an irate private citizen with no affiliations to any politician or any party. I just vote. And express my rage at these crooked sacks of pigshit.( pigshit's especially stinky stuff, I don't want to be offending all those fine dogs out there by calling these guys dogshit.) ( sorry pigs)

Sue FALCON and all the Crooks in the $50 million Mufford SCAM.

2009-02-06T22:03:00.000-08:00

I see in Jordan Bateman's blog he is telling someone not to attack unelected people. Langley Township staff are the guilty parties in this $5o million dollar Mufford overpass scam to weasel 250 acres out of the ALR so some insiders can make a killing, so why shouldn't they be attacked? They are supposed to serve the interests of the citizens of Langley, not the interests of a few insider developers and investors.

THIS OVERPASS IS BEING BUILT IN THE WRONG PLACE. ANYONE CAN SEE IT SHOULD BE BUILT ON THE MAJOR HIGHWAY WHICH IS ONLY A STONE'S THROW AWAY,HIGHWAY #10 , WHERE IT CROSSES THE TRACKS ON THE LANGLEY BYPASS NEAR GLOVER ROAD. IF THIS MUFFORD SCAM IS BUILT, HWY #10 TRAFFIC IS STILL GOING TO BE STOPPED BY EVERY TRAIN!!!!!!!!

So staff members should be fired for gross negligence for going along with scam and any politicians involved with this scam should be INVESTIGATED WITH RESPECT TO LAYING CRIMINAL CHARGES. $50 million dollars of taxpayer money is being ripped off to build a useless overpass in the wrong place with a monstrosity of connecting roads and bridges to nowhere for no other reason than to scam 250 acres out of the ALR to make a few insiders a pile of money.

No wonder the crooked councillors Bateman, Long, Ferguson,Fox,Kositsky and Ward's attacks on Green and Richter are so ceaseless and organized, now we see who's behind the attack campaign. It has now been exposed beyond any shadow of a doubt who ran the election machine to get these accquiescent nodding heads elected, to facilitate the rip off of taxpayers to benefit the few.
I have voted Socred, Federal Conservative, Christan Heritage Party and Provincial Liberal my entire life but there is no way I will ever vote for Campbell's Crooks ever again after this SCAM and THREAT LETTER FROM FALCON, TAKE YOUR OVERPASS AND STICK IT UP YOUR ASS YOU FUCKING CROOK! I'LL POST BLOGS ABOUT YOU ON MY WIRELESS INTERNET WHILE I'M WAITING FOR THE TRAINS TO PASS YOU CROOKED SACK OF SHIT!!!!!!
I BELIEVE THIS WHOLE SCAM IS SO GROSSLY NEGLIGENT THAT IF YOU PEOPLE DON'T PUT THE $50 MILLION INTO BUILDING THE OVERPASS WHERE IT SHOULD BE BUILT, ON HWY#10 ,THEN EVERY ELECTED POLITICIAN AND UNELECTED PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEE WHO CONCOCTED THIS GROSSLY NEGLIGENT MUFFORD SCAM SHOULD BE SUED PERSONALLY TO COME UP WITH THE 50 MILLION OUT OF YOUR OWN POCKETS. I UNDERSTAND THAT IF GROSS NEGLIGENCE IS PROVEN YOUR STATUS AS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL OR PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEE NO LONGER PROTECTS YOU FROM PERSONAL LIABILITY.

Spaghetti Western at Langley Town Hall

2009-02-06T10:11:00.000-08:00

So is anybody throwing anybody under the bus yet at Langley Town Hall or have we discovered the West's densest concentration of Clint Eastwood stare 'em down wannabes?

Bon Voyage!

2009-02-06T02:38:00.000-08:00

Regarding:

"I am off for a weeks holiday, reply as you may but no computer on deck so whistle in the wind and let it fly!
Hopefully in a week you will have calmed down and be more senstive to those around you"

Don't wear a lifejacket and be sure and get really drunk you stinking piece of dogshit.

where's the tapes Councillor Bateman?

2009-02-05T22:51:00.000-08:00

So Jordan, where's the tapes? Am I going to have to follow you around to all your photo ops with a megaphone and a few hundred pages of The Langley Corruptionator printed out for handouts to get those tapes or what? I thought you were the one on your high horse just recently spouting out about Chiliwack being a bunch of shitbags for requiring someone to make an FOI request to get some information
What are you, some kind of a hypocrite? These are recordings of meetings open to the public, the legislation says you don't need an FOI request to get such public information.

Where can I find a shedule of your upcoming photo ops?

( And, BTW, you pack of shitbags, everything that lying, thieving, criminal sack of shit buddy of Bob Long's and his sack of shit shyster told you about my dealings with him and his pack of scumbags in your secret " in camera" meeting is a complete pack of fucking lies, in case you sacks of shit haven't even figured that out by now. And the complete pack of lies they told you about me is 100% irrelevant to that matter anyway, the only two things relevant to that matter are the facts and the law. Anything about me personally is 100% irrelevant. I am merely a messenger.)

Pulling a Nixon with the tapes?

2009-02-05T15:41:00.001-08:00

So where are the tapes you Richard Millhouse Nixon wannabes?
This is the Langley Corruptionator's third request to Jordan Bateman to make a transcript of the tape( or simply an audio recording I will transcribe myself) available at the mayor's office for pickup.
These would be the tapes of the delegate appearance at the afternoon meeting of Township Council and subsequent discussion by council in the 7 o'clock meeting mentioned in a number of posts in this blog.
These tapes( or whatever sort of audio recording they are) will confirm what has been stated in a number of posts in the Langley Corruptionator.

A delegate appeared before council to report a theft and a fraud( stating he was 99.99% certain the fraud had occurred and 100% certain the theft had occurred). This theft of Township of Langley property was perpertrated by a lying, thieving criminal thug buddy of Bob Long's.

The delegate stated he had already spoken to the Langley RCMP at the Langley RCMP detachment about the theft and the Langley RCMP said it sounded as though a theft had occurred, but they would only investigate the theft if Mayor or council requested it. I said that's ridiculous, this property has been paid for by Township taxpayer's who would want the theft of their property investigated no matter what any crooked mayor or council had to say about it.( the mayor was crooked Kurt at the time).The cop wouldn't take a statement or give me a file number so I left. ( a good lawyer has since told me the cop was entirely wrong and there is no question he should have taken a statement and given me a file number and taken the evidence I had brought with me and started an investigation) ( Maybe this cop was one of the four who assisted Robert Dzkanski upon his arrival to this country, but I'm not sure)

I also pointed out to the cop how ridiculous his logic was in that it rendered an investigation of corruption by mayor and council impossible because according to his logic mayor and council would have to refer an investigation of their own corruption to the RCMP themselves. The cop had nothing to say about this observation ( Maybe he was reminiscing about the good ole days of standing around doing nothing while Robert Dzkanski was dying)

I subsequently reported all this to council as a delegate, explaining the RCMP said it sounded as though a theft had occurred but it would not investigate unless the matter was referred to them by mayor or council.
A few councillors asked some questions ( aimed at trying to concoct a coverup I thought) but councillor Richter asked very pointed and specific questions intended to reiterate that:
1) I had already spoken to the RCMP,
and 2) The RCMP had said it would investigate the theft if the matter were
referred to them by council, and
3) All I was asking for is that council refer this matter to the RCMP for investigation.

Councillor Richter then made a motion that council refer this matter for investigation.

Then: Mayor Alberts, Councillors Bateman, Long, Ferguson, Fox, Kositsky, Ward and
Vickburg sat on their hands and said nothing.

Feb. 1, 2009. The lieing shitbag criminal councillors post in their lieing shitbag anonymous blog a total misrepresentation of this delegation which is a 100% complete and total lie. And state the most vile and slanderous lies about what Councillor Richter did. WhatRichter did, make the motion to refer, is exactly what every single one of the 100, 000 citizens of Langley would expect each and every one of the councillors to have done ( excepting, of course, Bob Long's lying criminal thug buddy)

BTW, as you crooked councillors have demonstrated yourselves completely incapable of looking out for the interests of the citizens of Langley, as you wre elected to do, I am attending to the matter of the fraud myself, to ensure justice is done.

If the tapes confirm what I say, and they will, then it has been proven you crooked councillors are morally unfit to hold public office and must immediately resign.

So where are the tapes you Richard Millhouse Nixon wannabes?

Langley Township Zoning Bylaw 2500 (1987)

2009-02-05T08:41:00.000-08:00

Temporary Mobile Homes

201.4 A mobile home as a temporary accessory dwelling is subject to the following

conditions:

a. That the principal dwelling is occupied by the owner of the property;

b. That the mobile home is occupied by:

i) an employee of the owner where such property is operated as a bonafide

farm; or

ii) the Father, Mother, Son, Daughter, Grandfather, Grandmother,

Grandson, Granddaughter, Brother or Sister, of the Owner of the

property;

Updates Feb. 5, 2009

2009-02-05T06:15:00.000-08:00

Updates feb. 5, 2009 :

In the post entitled " Lieing sacks of shit Jordan Bateman et. al. " if you scroll part way down the post you will find in Bold Lettering an ADDENDUM:which is dated February 5, 2009.

Time for crooked councillors to resign?

2009-02-04T17:18:00.000-08:00

I see those hypocrites Ferguson andf Long are bad mouthing Councillor Kim Richter in their anonymous lieing B.S. blog and shooting off their fool mouths on their soapbox about not interfering in RCMP business. Would Long , Ferguson, Bateman, Ward and Fox kindly ask RCMP Superintendent Armstrong to supply the Township's citizens with a list of the names of the councillors who piled into Superintendent Armstrong's office to interfere in RCMP business on behalf of their friends Coleman and Polak immediately after Sonya Patterson filed her complaint with the Langley RCMP pursuant to the Local Government Act about these hypocrites two friends Coleman and Polak? And if any of the names Long , Ferguson, Bateman,Ward and Fox are on the that list will they now immediately resign their positions as councillors because they have proven themselves to be hypocritical and corrupt liars morally unfit to hold public office ?

It is also recommended that everyone carefully read the post in this blog entitled " Bob Long's criminal friends"., because it involves a coverup of the theft of Township property by a criminal thug friend of Bob Long's. Councillor Richter made a motion to refer this theft of Township property to the RCMP for investigation,as the RCMP had requested that Mayor or Council do, but instead of complyimg with this simple request by the RCMP, Bob Long , Jordan Bateman, Steve Ferguson,Grant Ward, Charlie Fox, Howie Vickburg and Kurt Alberts instead assisted with the coverup of this theft by Bob's buddy by refusing to second Richter's motion. Then those same crooked councillors had the pure unmitigated gall to outright lie in their anonymous blog and accuse Richter of interfering in RCMP business, when they all knew full well that it was the RCMP who had requested council to refer the matter to them for investigation, because the delegate making the request had told them exactly that.( Kurt Alberts alone, BTW, as a Mayor is a Public Safety Officer, could have requested the investigation by himself alone; The Township's voters made the right call on that guy, but unfortunately the wrong call on all the others) Everything stated by that delegate has been recorded, according to the procducers of that anonymous B.S. Blog, so I am still awaiting confirmation by a comment posted to this blog that a transcript of that recording is available for me to pick up in Langley Township Mayor Green's office. I previously made a request to Jordan Bateman in this blog if he could request this transcript be made available for pickup in the mayor's office. If he could squeeze in the time to do it between all his dog and pony show photo shoots, that is. ( dog and pony show photo shoots, sounds excatly like a typical Kurt Albert's day doesn't it?and we all know the Township voter's judgement of him)

Snivelling Shitbags crying because they can't ripoff taxpayers.

2009-02-03T08:01:00.000-08:00

I see those lieing shitbags Jordan Bateman, Bob Long, Steve Ferguson,Mel Kositsky, Grant Ward and charlie fox are snivelling in their lieing shitbag blog that they are unable to hold improperly closed secret meetings where they can concoct secret deals to ripoff taxpayers for tens of millions of dollars behind closed doors, while all the while lieing to taxpayers about the true nature of the secret rip off deal. that 50 million dollar ripoff scam known as the mufford overpass proposal is being exposed for what it is, a scam to weasel 250 acres out of the ALR with 50 million dollars of completely useless and unecessary roads and bridges.

Any 50 million dollars spent on an overpass in this township should obviously be spent building an overpass where Hwy Ten crosses the tracks on Langley bypass. Anyone with even a 5th grade education could figure that out, but those six lieing shitbag councillors and the Township's high priced so called professionals can't seem to figure it out. that mufford opverpass proposal is so obviously a scam that someone should spend the time to figure out who stands to benefit from that 250 acres being scammed out of the ALR, and how many phone calls they made to our six lieing shitbag male councillor criminals.

Lieing sacks of human waste Jordan Bateman et. al.

2009-02-03T04:38:00.001-08:00

Jordan bateman, in his lying sack of feces blog, makes a weekly plug for a completely anonymous blog which is nothing but a complete pack of lies designed to promote those criminal pieces of human waste liars Bob Long, Jordan Bateman , Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky,Grant Ward and Charlie Fox. These pieces of feces, in their liars blog, have made a post which is a complete pack of lies of the most serious sort, from start to finish. I have saved a copy of that copmplete pack of lies post dated February 1, 2009 and I will debunk every one of those lies, sentence by sentence, with the truth in this post. By the end of this post it will be very clear that Jordan Bateman, Bob Long, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky Grant Ward and Charlie Fox are a pack of complete fucking liars who are utterly devoid of any of the moral fibre necessary to make them fit to hold public office of any sort. Stay tuned. Message to Jordan Bateman: Would you knidly make available for pickup in the mayor`s office, as soon as possible, a complete transcript of the recording of the delegate appearance mentioned in your February 1 liars blog post as well as a complete transcript of the subsequent discussion at the 7 Oclock meeting of that 4pm delegation request.

I think, BTW, Kim Richter should sue you sacks of human waste for everything you've got for the complete pack of lies and slander of the worst sort which you stated about her in your complete pack of lies February 1 post. More on that to follow you worthless and criminal lieing sacks of dogfeces... And BTW Bateman, I am going to make sure your record as a complete sack of worthless feces follows you every where you go, for all time. Stay tuned...

ADDENDUM; FEB.5,2009; in the lying shitbag criminal councillors post is the following statement: "there was a delegate to TOL Council who wanted council to instruct the RCMP to investigate a matter that the RCMP had previously reviewed and determined it to be unfounded."

That is an outright complete lie and those six councillors know it and the proof is in the tape recording of the delegates appearance and councillor Richter's motion. The R.C.M.P. had never reviewed this matter of stolen gravel and those lying councillors know that. The first the councillors ever heard of this gravel theft was when the delegate told them about it in his appearance before council and he said very clearly at the time, and Richter wquestioned him on this before she made her motion, " I reported the theft to an R.C.M.P. officer at the Langley Detachment Headquarters ( and the RCMP might have this entire discussion taped and videoed because the delegate spoke to the officer in the room used to make tape and video statements) and the RCMP officer I spoke to said it sounded as thgough there probably was a theft but as the Township of Langley owns the gravel they would have to ask the RCMP to investigate. I told the RCMP officer that the current mayor and council were a pack of corrupt shitbags ( Alberts et. al.at the time) and that this thief was one of their criminal shitbag buddies so they would probably concoct some way to weasel out of it. The RCMP officer said, "Well go to the newspapers". As the local newspapers are the Langley times and Langley Advance I knew that would be a total waste of time, so I told the R.C..M.P. officer, "No, I am going to go to the Surrey Provincial Courthouse and file a private information about the theft" as the RCMP punk didn't really seem to give a shit what I did I then left the R.C.M.P. detachment.

TO SUMMARIZE THIS ASPECT: In his delegation the `delegate told the crooked councillors that a theft of Township property had occurred and that he had already spoken to the R.C.M.P. about it and the R.C.M.P. said all they would need to investigate the theft is for mayor or council to refer the matter to them, and they would investigate. Councillor Richter qestioned the delegates on these points, then made the motion of referral the RCMP had requested. When asked for a seconder Mayor Alberts and councillors Bateman, Long, Ferguson, Fox, Ward Kositsky and Vickburg sat there and said absolutely nothing. Now three months later those councilors still on council come out in their anonymous blog and state a lie which is exactly the opposite of the truth.
Those councillors assisted with the coverup of a theft by Bob Long`s buddy by refusing to refer it for investigation as the RCMP requested and now, three moths later, are lying about it. There is absolutely no question Jordan Bateman,Bob Long, Steve Ferguson, Charlie Fox, G rant Ward and Mel Kositsky are morally unfit to hold elected office and should immediately resign or be removed from office and may likely have also breached sections of the Criminal Code of Canada, the Local Government Act and the Community Charter.

The phrase those crooked councillors mentioned in their anonymous B.S. blog , ``The R.C.M.P. previously reviewed and determined to be unfounded` comes from a strictly confidential document from a section 56 review by the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia concerning a matter completely unrelated to this gravel theft, and whoever quoted that in the crooked councillors B.S. blog may very well have broken the law. That phrase was also part of an official complaint to the local detachment of the RCMP who have advised it is a complaint which must be handled by the National RCMP detachment in Ottawa.

Bottom line here: The above mentioned councillors are morally unfit to hold public office and must immediately resign or be removed from office.( and may even be guilty of offences pursuant to this matter)
END OF This ADDENDUM, more to follow later.

Lieing sack of feces Councillor Jordan Bateman

2009-02-03T02:56:00.000-08:00

The following is very interesting post lifted in its entirety from the criminal sack of human waste councillor's blog page. Why is this post so interesting? Because those criminal sack of feces liars Bob Long, Jordan Bateman, Steve Ferguson,Mel Kositsky,Grant Ward and Charlie Fox know this post of theirs is a complete pack of lies from start to finish yet they posted it on their website to intentionally spread their disgusting and libelous lies to every citizen of Langley who checks out their site. How can I prove this post of theirs is a complete pack of lies and they are knowingly spreading their lies and libel to everyone in Langley? As those pack of liars have already posted imn their website everything said in council is recorded. Jordan Bateman: I am hereby requesting that you see to it a complete transcript of this delegatiuon to council at the four o clock meeting, and your Councillors discussion of this delegation request at the seven o clock meeting be made available for me to pick up at Mayor Green's office as soon as possible.

What follows is the complete pack of lies posted by Bateman et. al. and following that I will debunk each and every one of their lies sentence by sentence with the truth:

You will note in the list of motions below that Councillor Kim Richter once again is trying to meddle in RCMP/Police business. This is at least the third time in a few months that Coun. Richter ihas tried to interfere with our justice system, as if the Langley RCMP don’t know how to do their jobs.

In late 2008 there was a delegate to TOL Council who wanted council to instruct the RCMP to investigate a matter that the RCMP had previously reviewed and determined it to be unfounded.

During this delegation a TOL Bylaws Officer was asked to stand by in council chambers, in case of incident, as there were some safety concerns. Later councilors told us that they had intended to listen to the delegate, but as the RCMP had already offered their professional opinion, council felt it inappropriate to tell the RCMP how to do their job. Councillor Richter ignored the safety of her fellow councilors and broke from rank to offer a motion, which was not seconded. Fortunately the delegate left council chambers without incident due to the Bylaws office being present.

It is NOT appropriate for politicians to TELL the RCMP how to do their jobs. We are at a total loss to explain why this councillor thinks it is OK for politicians to control the police. It is a VERY slippery slope and this is NOT a good precedent. Would Coun. Richter be OK with the RCMP coming in to a council meeting and telling them what to do? This is BAD politics folks, and politicians have no business telling police professionals how to do their jobs. This is why the TOL Charter and other such charters prohibit a police board.

Bateman, Long, Ferguson,Kositsky,Ward and Fox are a pack of complete fucking liars to post this and here is the truth:

Lie #1) "a matter the R.C.M.P. had already investigated and had found to be vwithout merit"

You lieing fucking sacks of shit, You know full fucking well that is not what the R.C.M.P. said, as the delegate sauid in his submission " I observed a theft of Township property ( by Bob Long's criminal sack of shit buddy, BTW) and went to the R.C.M. P. detachment in langley to report the theft. After explainind

Crooked Councilors Red Herring Blog.

2009-02-02T22:46:00.000-08:00

I see Langley's crooked councillors, Jordan Bateman, Bob Long , Mel Kositsky, Steve Ferguson, Grant Ward and that Fox kidney guy, whatever his name is, are trying to draw attention to Vancouver facing an 8.42% tax hike in their bullshit blog.

Wake up and smell the coffee you crooked pieces of shit. Vancouver may be facing an 8.42% tax hike because its hosting an Olympics. Any tax hike Langley faces is only because you incompetent and crooked pieces of dog shit have improperly arranged secret crooked deals behind closed doors to rip off Langley Taxpayers for tens of millions of dollars to enrich your friends and the people who got you elected.

Bob Long's criminal friends?

2009-02-02T19:14:00.000-08:00

It’s obvious why those lying thieving criminal sack of feces councillors Bob Long, Jordan Bateman, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky, Grant Ward and Charlie Fox are maintaining complete anonymity while they produce their lying bullshit blog.

They are outright complete fxxxxxg liars in their bullshit blog and the documented evidence to prove that will be accquired and printed here shortly.

I am specifically referring to their Sunday February 1, 2009 post where they refer to a motion made by Councillor Richter to refer a case of theft to the R.C.M.P. for investigation. This theft of Township property and defrauding of the Township was perpertrated by a lying thieving defrauding criminal thug buddy of that lying thieving criminal sack of feces crooked councillor Bob Long.

How interesting that three months after Richter made the motion those lying thieving criminal sacks of human waste Bob Long, Jordan Bateman, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky, Grant Ward and Charlie Fox feel the need to print a complete pack of outright lies about the matter to deflect attention from their own criminal involvement.

One of that criminal sack of poo Bob Long’s criminal sack of poop buddies was observed receiving property stolen from the Township. When the witness reported this theft to the Langley R.C.M.P at the Langley R.C. M. P. Detachment he was told by some young punk R.C. M. P. officer, who was obviously fresh out of some fruitcake appeasing community college, that he did believe a theft had occurred, but because the stolen property was the property of the Township that the R.C.M. P. would not investigate unless the Township, either Council or Mayor, nade the request.

I pointed out to the young punk R.C. M. P. officer that the stolen property had been paid for by the Township’s taxpayers and the Township’s taxpayer’s would probably be very irate to discover the R.C. M. P. refused to investigate the theft of their property. The witness had photographic evidence of the theft on C.D.s which the R.C.M.P. punk refused to accept and the witness also stated he had produced an eight page affidavit detailing the matter which he would swear under oath and that he was prepared to answer videotaped questions about the matter under oath so long as the suspects and Langley Township employees were required to do the same.

The R.C.M.P. punk still refused to investigate what he acknowledged probably was a theft unless the mayor, that crooked sack of feces Alberts at the time, asked then to investigate.

I pointed out to the R.C.M.P. punk that by his idiotic logic the R.C.M.P. would not investigate, for example, a theft of copper B.C. Hydro power lines unless the theft was reported by B.C. Hydro’s chairman. The R.C.M.P. punks logic is obviously totally absurd.

ADDENDUM, Wed,Feb.4,09: I should also mention that some time after trying to file this theft complaint with the RCMP, I happened to be having a conversation with a very good lawyer and I mentioned the RCMP punks refusal to issue a file number and take a statement about the theft. This lawyer told me the RCMP officer was completely wrong and there is absolutely no question he should have immediately taken a statement and issued a file number in regards to the theft.

I might also point out a formal written complaint about this theft was made to Kurt Alberts, Township Manager Mark Bakken and Township Manager of Roads Terry Veer, but, as I suspected, they merely concocted a false recounting of the matter based on the evidence I gave them. Initially Veer tried to say there would be no written record of matter by the Township. I must give the punk cop credit that he at least agreed the Township should have supplied a written response to the formal written complaint.

The Township did supply a written reply to the formal complaint of theft some months later when they were forced to by the complainant delivering a covering letter and eight page statement about the theft to Alberts, Bakken and Veer on November 28, 2008.

It must be pointed out Bakken still has not supplied answers to all the questions about that theft contained in the covering letter delivered November 28, 2008.

It must also be pointed out that any monkey with even half a split pea for a brain could deduce from the evidence that Bob Long’s criminal piece of crap buddy had received property stolen from the Township of Langley and that Township of Langley Staff or employees must be involved in a coverup of this theft. I suppose Township Staff and/or employees are involved in covering up this theft because the thief is one of councillor Bob Long’s buddies who is therefore a special status citizen who is allowed and assisted to break any and all laws in the Township that he feels like breaking.

And if Bob Long’s criminal sack of crap buddy’s crime spree endangers the lives of innocent and law abiding decent long term Township citizens who have never broken a single law or a done a single thing wrong in their entire lives then that’s just tough luck. The fact is that in Bob Long’s, Jordan Bateman's, Steve Ferguson’s, Mel Kositsky’s, Grant Ward’s, and Charlie Fox’s Township of Langley their criminal sack of crap buddy’s must be allowed and assisted to continue their crime sprees and coverups at all costs. (about $80,000 dollars of hard earned Township taxpayer dollars to date, BTW.)

The only councillor who did the right thing in this matter is Kim Richter, who rightfully made a motion the Township refer this matter to the R.C.M.P. for investigation, as per the young punk R.C.M.P. officer’s request.

Those lying thieving criminal sacks of feces Bob Long, Jordan Bateman, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky, Grant Ward, Charlie Fox, Kurt Alberts and Howie Vickburg refused to even second Richter’s motion, because they obviously don't want to see their criminal sack of feces friends called to account for their criminal activity.

The witness also mentioned that when Bob Long’s criminal sack of human waste of buddy first bought this property, a whole swack of Township of Langley Dump trucks were observed dumping many loads of gravel on his property,most likely stolen from the Township of Langley, throughout the summer of 2005.

When the witness to the theft left council chambers Times reporter Al Irwin followed him to ask questions about the theft, but of course that crooked fxxxxxg sack of sxxt criminal Bob Long scurried after them to interject himself into the conversation and try to characterize the theft as being some linked to another completely unrelated matter.Why would Long do such a thing? He’s obviously interested in keeping his criminal sack of $#^% buddy and himself from being exposed, along with all the other criminal sacks of $@!& in Township Hall.

One last point: The witness knew, from previous experience in dealing with the crooked sacks of human waste at Langley Township hall, that the crooked sacks of $&*# would simply concoct a coverup based on the evidence they were aware of. That is why the witness withheld some crucial pieces of evidence from the crooked sacks of $#&* at the Towenship.

Will the crooked sack of $^&* councillors Jordan Bateman, Bob Long, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kosisky, Grant Ward and Charlie Fox now finally do the right thing and refer this theft conspiracy, and its subsequent coverup, by Bob Long`s criminal sack of shit lying thieving thug buddy to the R.C.M.P. for investigation?

ADDENDUM : Bob Long was informed in a lengthy telephone conversation April 12, 2008 That Langley Township Dumptruck Hood # XX-XX, License plate # XXXX-XX was observed dumping gravel stolen from the Township of Langley at his criminal thug buddy's Property. At the time Bob asked, "Are you sure it was a TOL Dump truck?", to which he was assured yes it was, the witness told Bob he could see the Green TOL crest on the door of the White cab and the plate number and hood number. Bob also asked if it wasn't just dumping spoil and was assured the truck dumped 10 yards of clean unused gravel straight from the depot. Perhaps Bob Long could explain what transpired since that phone call that his criminal thug buddy was not charged with theft of TOL property paid for by TOL taxpayers? Perhaps Bob Long might wish to explain what other laws and TOL bylaws he has assisted his criminal thug buddy in cicumventing, breaking and evading? Perhaps Bob Long and his crooked sack of $#&* criminal buddies Glen Gordon, Kurt alberts, Kurt Houlden, Jordan Bateman, Steve Ferguson, Mel Kositsky, Charlie Fox, Howie Vickburg, Grant Ward, et. al. would like to explain when they are going to repay the Township the $80,000 dollars of hard earned Langley taxpayer dollars they have cost the Township so far in assisting Bob Long`s criminal sack of feces thug buddy in breaking, evading, and circumventing countless laws and bylaws to date?

A friendly helpful reminder: From the Criminal Code of Canada:Fraud where the subject matter of the fraud is worth over $5,000 dollars is an indictable offense.

Crooked Councillors Red Herring Blog.

2009-01-31T02:53:00.000-08:00

A Big Gold Star for Sonya Paterson.

2008-12-20T01:10:00.000-08:00

The Langley Corruptionator awards a big gold star to Sonya Patterson to have the intelligence, integrity and courage to make a complaint to the R.C.M.P. to start the process of cleaning up this corrupt little cesspool known as the Township of Langley's local government.

Sonya's efforts are only the tip of the iceberg of what is required to clean the corrupt garbage out of the Township of Langley and return the Township to the rule of law.

The Langley Corruptionator encourages all citizens of the Township to read; T he Criminal Code of Canada sections relating to the administration of law and justice, and other sections relating to fraud and theft and theft like offences;The Local Government Act;And The Community Charter.
Township citizens who are aware of activities concerning the Township's Local Government which contravene these Acts or the Criminal Code should then make a formal written complaint to the Langley R.C.M.P. as Sonya Patterson has done. ***NEW*** That recent article in one of Langley's sellout local papers referring to Sonya as a failed candidate is nothing but completely irrelevant B.S. to distract you from the fact that Coleman and Polak are guilty as sin. Just google the Local Goverment Act and read sections 83 and 84 and a few nearby related sections and you can see for yourself they're guilty. They don't have to pay for ads or anything else to be an election organizer, all they have to is act in a way to favor the election of one candidate over another. Daphne Bramham of the Vancouver Sun quoted sections of the Local Government Act in her article about this matter so why didn't our local rags do the same? It would debunk the disinformation they are paid to spew I guess.

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

The Criminal Code of Canada can be found here: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-46/

The Local Government Act can be found here:
http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/L/9623_00.htm

And the Community Charter can be found here:
http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/c/03026_00.htm

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

A $50 million plus RIPOFF OF TAXPAYERS from Canada's Corruption Capital, Langley Township:

2008-12-17T11:50:00.000-08:00

( This ripoff scam overpass proposal has nothing to do with Mayor Green or Councillor Richter, this was inherited from the Township's 2005 to 2008 sellout council, how much did the people behind this proposed ripoff spend getting the sellout council re-elected?)

"The Mufford Cres overpass looks like a bridge to nowhere, no matter which option we go for. Why would we want to have such a major (and expensive) connection to 64 Ave/216 St - not exactly a high density area. The traffic wants to flow south to Murrayville/Brookswood via the Langley Bypass, or north to Fort Langley/ Hwy 1, not east to the ALR lands on 64 Ave, which is not even a truck route.
Back to the drawing board people. (<- this post was lifted from somewhere else which has nothing to do with The Langley Corruptionator)

You hit the nail on the head. This is just a scam to waste tens of millions of taxpayer money to build a whole pile of unecessary roads to partition farmland so the developers can then say it's useless for farming and make millions by getting it out of the ALR and developing it.

For the amount of money being wasted on this scam you could build two overpasses: One over the tracks at 200 street and One over the tracks at the bypass near glover. Then all you would need is a tiny connector road from the bypass to Mufford.

The traffic over the tracks at either one of 200th or the bypass is vastly greater than the traffic over the tracks at Mufford which is how you can tell this entire proposal is a scam. Of course, the only problem with this proposal instead of the Mufford overpass proposal, so far as certain characters are concerned, is this idea would improve traffic flow many magnitudes greater than the mufford proposal would, this proposal would be way cheaper for taxpayers, and this proposal wouldn't allow insider developers to scam one square inch out of the ALR to line their pockets.( all these posts were lifted from somewhere else which has nothing to do with The Langley Corruptionator)

This Mufford overpass proposal is a complete scam to make insider developers and builders rich. Even a stupid monkey with half a split pea for a brain can see that this Mufford Overpass proposal is a complete scam to make insiders rich at the expense of Langley Taxpayers and ALR farmland, so why can't the sellout council which is all the re-elected incumbents of the 2005 to 2008 council, except for Councillor Richter, see it. Is Richter the only re-elected incumbent who isn't a moron or is Richter the only re-elected incumbent who isn't bought,sold and paid for?( <- this post might have been lifted from somewhere else,I can't remenmber for sure, but I'm still going to say this post has nothing to do with The Langley Corruptionator anyway.) ***NEW***It gets even worse: I've just learned more abou this Ripoff Mufford Overpass proposal The overpass they are propsing will pass over the tracks and Glover, so all that heavy traffic westbound on Glover that turns right on the bypass will still be stopped by trains!as will all the traffic on the bypass, including the traffic turning left off the bypass onto Glover. Any overpass of the tracks should obviously be built on the bypass near Glover, because all the glover traffic as well will overpass the trains.Obviously the only reason to include this additional utterly useless overpass over glover is simply to fabricate a requirement for yet more roads to nowhere to scam even more land out of the ALR for the Township's developer buddies to make millions. This whole Ripoff Mufford Overpass proposal is so outrageously obviously a complete scam that some so called " professionals " and " experts" somewhere must have been paid off to appprove it. The R.C.M.P. should immediately begin a criminal investigation.***SPECIAL NOTE TO TOWNSHIP COUNCILLORS OTHER THAN RICHTER or MAYOR GREEN: Your usual Red Herring of "outsiders" doesn't apply here (or, incidentally, to anyone else for that matter, if someone is right about you guys ripping off the Township's taxpayers it doesn't matter whether or not they live in Langley, they are still right ( The fallacy of "Argumentum Ad Hominem, BTW") ) , Because I drive over those tracks at the Bypass and Glover almost every day, sometimes a few times in a day, so you crooked scumbags needn't waste your breath spewing out that item of your standard B.S. repertoire.

The Events Centre Fiasco: Fraud? Breach of Trust? Call the R.C.M.P.?

2008-12-16T09:43:00.000-08:00

From the Criminal Code of Canada:

Fraud

380. (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand

There is no question the R.C.M.P. should investigate Kurt Alberts and the silent seven for fraud, and possibly other criminal charges if they said the events center was a P3 when in fact it wasn't.

If the Langley Taxpayer's had been told the truth, that they were going to pay the lion's share of the costs while Albert's and the silent seven's developer buddies were going to reap the lion's share of the profits, there is no way this Events Center agreement would have been allowed. Langleys Taxpayers were lied to. The RCMP should also investigate the Events Center fiasco with respect to Sections 119,120,121,122 and 123 of the Criminal Code of Canada and also with respect to election financing sections of the Local Government Act, and sections in the Community Charter. How much did these toadies pay to get these weasels elected?

What to expect from The Langley Corruptionator:

2008-12-14T11:29:00.000-08:00

As well as blogs, in the Langley Corruptionator you will also be finding articles featuring things like written Property Use Complaints and Written Formal Complaints made to the Township of Langley. Accompanying these documents will be the relevant law. Also accompanying these documents will be the relevant facts as found in such documents as correspondence to and from; the Township of Langley, the Langley R.C.M.P., the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, sworn affidavits, submissions from law firms,etc. etc. etc., and the like.

Readers of the Langley Corruptionator, then, will have before them both the facts and the law relevant to the matters in question. This will allow readers to answer for themselves the question, " Was this matter dealt with in a way that was corrupt, or not corrupt?"
Knowing that the Township of Langley is awash in lawyers I will state that any and all comments made by The Langley Corruptionator should not be construed as accusing anyone, or anything, of corruption. Anyone who believes The Langley Corruptionator is accusing anyone of corruption is the holder of a mistaken belief.
The Langley Corruptionator is simply going to present the facts and the law and allow readers to make their minds up for themselves.
Also found on The Langley Corruptionator might be any other items that seem interesting or amusing.

<- Hi Rod, how's biz?

West Vancouver’s political groups probed (The Vancouver Sun, 13 Dec 2008, Page A10)

2008-12-13T19:59:00.001-08:00

West Vancouver’s political groups probed
DAPHNE BRAMHAM VANCOUVER SUN
The Vancouver Sun
13 Dec 2008

West Vancouver police are investigating complaints that two organizations that endorsed candidates in the November municipal election breached the Local Government Act. Both groups — West Vancouver Citizens for Good Government and Low Tax, Low Growth...read more...

Corruption and Gross Negligence in Langley Township?

2008-12-13T01:51:00.000-08:00

There is a special class of citizen in the Township of Langley who can break whatever laws or bylaws they want.
This special class of citizen is known as the "Good Ole Boys".
The Good Ole Boys can break and ignore whatever laws and bylaws they want, no matter what amount of damages and cost and loss and threat to personal safety is incurred by neighbouring long term Township residents who've never put even one foot wrong in their entire lives.
In Langley Township there is no Rule of Law.